I have talked about the demon, the daimon or our shadow and how it may unconsciously wreak havoc in our lives and in the lives of others without our knowing about how it works,without our being aware of it. We now know that the shadow, the darkness which is ours, is something or someone we cannot escape but which is something most difficult to contact because it is by nature elusive as it is the reflection of ourselves when there is no light. But surely the important thing is to get to know what that shadow in ourselves may look like. If we do not, we shall have no way of dealing with it.
In the article "Writing About the Other" Deena Metzger skteches for us her way of helping us to get to grips with our own shadow. Metzger begins with something very obvious: "to contact the shadow, we must be willing to go into the dark, for that is where it lives." We must learn to build a partnership with our shadow because if we do not, we run the risk of its coming to us in a furtive and violent manner. Yet in coming towards it, we may have to face the risk of being engulfed by it. In the dark, we often feel as if we ourselves are the dark, that we have become that darkness. Yet there is no other way. We must learn what our shadow looks like. Our shadow is our other face, a secret self, the dark side of our soul, our psyche.
How then do we meet our own shadow? First, we must concede that there are parts of ourselves that we consider absolutely foreign and alien, something we abhor, we disdain, something we deny. But we must admit that these parts, horrific as they are, are still part of ourselves. Our conscious self and our unconscious shadow form a continuum. To access it, we need to first of all to show to the shadow that we are no longer hostile to it. We must be friendly to our own darkness before it may be encouraged to reveal itself further to us. We must offer it our olive branch.
We all know that the shadow lengthens with sunset, as the night approaches. The sun is our reason. If we wish the shadow to emerge, first we must for the sake of encouraging the shadow to emerge from the darkness, hide itself for a while and stop the sharpness of its analytic sword, as the rays of sunlight dull and blur the sharpness of its edges as the sun dims in the twilight. We must stop thinking. We must learn to be aware when our brain is working and gently bid it to slow down, to stop before the shadow will reveal itself.
Next, Metzger asks us to ask ourselves calmly but honestly a series of probing questions: What are those qualities or attributes in "others" that we find least like ourselves? Who hates us most? What are our own most intractable prejudices? With what kind of people we find ourselves the least comfortable? With what kind of people we feel the least affinity?What kind of people revolt, offend, terrify or enrage us? What kind of people we consider "beneath" us? What kind of behavior we find "grotesque"? Under what kind of circumstances would we feel too humiliated to continue living? What kind of horror within ourselves would we find most unbearable? We must write down our answers. After we have done that, we may find that some of such aversions are based on moral or ethical judgement and that many of them will fill us with repugnance, contempt, loathing, revulsion and nausea. These are all part of our shadow. They live within our shadow.
Then what we do is that we allow a character to formulate itself: someone with a name, a personality, a history. We must know where she lives, what her house looks like, what she eats for lunch, what she thinks, what she fears, what she wants, dreams about etc. If one is called Peter, we call him Peter II. We must be friendly with Peter II and ask him as a bosom friend everything we want to know about him and enter into a dialogue with him. The idea is to get a psychological or personality sketch of him.
Another method suggested by Metzger to enable what our shadow looks like is for us to "imagine" that our life is threatened. To escape, we must create another identity, a false cover. The cover must be perfect. It must be so like ourselve and yet so different that we can be perfectly disguised while living the life of this our double. Who is this character we become to disguise ourselves and thereby save our own life? We imagine ourselves invisible and follow through every moment of that alter ego's day or week, and observe him/her alone and with others. What does this other character think when unable to sleep at 3 a.m. in the morning. What secrets, griefs, insights are we privy to? What essential part of ourselves is covered by this persona? In thus questioning and probing and discovering this other "self", we must be curious about everything but we must be careful not to make any judgment, nor to criticize him or her. We must do our best not to allow our own personal biases and fears to contaminate or to destroy the observation and revelations that occur.
After we have completed this second step, we will have a fair idea of what our shadow looks like. This shadow is our sibling, born of the same parents. Then we must go on to write down what our relationship with this sibling is. We must project ourselves imaginatively into the past, when we were still friendly with this other self, this Peter II. We then ask when the two parted company and started pursuing different lives. Imagine ourselves to be our own parents reminiscing about each of these two parts of ourselves, talking about their differences and similarities.
Finally, Metzger asks us to allow this sibling, this other, this enemy, this cover to look back at our present self. Allow this character to speak to us in his or her own voice and to create a portrait of us. From this other perspective, how do we look? As the other has developed a voice, enter into dialogue with each other. What is it you each want to know?
The shadow whose outlines and personality sketch thus created is in fact a part of ourself. It has always been with us. It is in fact not separate from us. We can now look at this other character from both sides, from the inside and from the outside. Metzger says that there is this irony " the one with whom you have created an island of communality and mutual understanding is utterly other and the one who is utterly other is the one whom you can understand perfectly". Then we are asked to imagine ourselves living the other's life and finally imagine the death of the shadow self. How does that shadow die, given the kind of personality that it has?
To Metzger, the shadow never dies. We always cast a shadow. The important thing is how we relate to it. Once it is known, we have inevitably lost an innocence that can never be recovered. "What replaces it is a knowledge of the complexity of our nature.". She says, "in the end, what remains is what we can only come to know, when we are alone, naked, and the light is behind us." She ends the article with a poem by Wendell Berry:
I go among trees and sit still.
All my stirring becomes quiet
around me like circles on water.
My tasks lie in their places
where I left them, asleep like cattle.
Then what is afraid of me comes
and lives a while in my sight.
What it fears in me leaves me,
and the fear of me leaves it.
It sings, and I hear its song.
Then what I am afraid comes,
I live for a while in its light.
What I fear in it leaves it
and the fear of it leaves me.
It sings, and I hear its song.
If we want our lives to be whole, we must become friends with our own shadow. We must respect its right to its own life. We do not attack our friends. We try to know our friends. We try to understand our friends. When our friends are in a temper, we try to calm them down. That's all. Is that it?
"Who knows an egg comes first or a hen comes first?"
回覆刪除But we knowm that a shadow exists only when there is sunshine...! Therefore we should also befriend the sunshine of our lives besides the shadows of our own images!
[版主回覆06/29/2010 15:07:00]
There is no question of what comes first. Your question makes an implicit assumption that one thing must come before another. There is no basis for such an assumption. Sorry my friend. Both good and evil exist in us. Good cannot be defined except in relation to evil, and vice versa. The same goes for the pairs light/darkness; reason/emotion; subjective/objective, good/bad. These are all categories of the mind empirically necessary to help us "talk" or "discuss" about certain phenomena which we experience in our daily lives. In reality and in themselves, everything is one and indivisible. Like water, we may separate reality by putting it into different vessels containing it when the water/reality takes on the shape of its respective containers. We must not confuse the shape that reality takes in our mind for reality itself.
It is human nature to seek light, not darkness. But that does not mean we are free to disregard the darkness. Both the darkness and the light have equal rights to their respective existence. That is simply the way that it is, whether or not we like it or whether or not we wish to disregard it or whether or not we find the darkness frightening, disgusting or unacceptable. There is little need to teach ordinary folks to want sunshine because that is their "normal" habit. They are doing it daily without the slightest bidding from us. But there may be a great need to let them know the importance of accepting and even befriending our darkness, our shadow, our other "face", something we would dearly like to but cannot forever sweep under the carpet. We cannot understand what we "normally" regard as our "enemy" unless we allow ourselves to approach it and we encourage our "enemy" to talk to us about its needs.
In fact, most people do exercise self-reflection during moments when they are all by themselves, and they are aware of what their foibles are, big or small. Introspection is the very moment when people are most honest with themselves for that’s the moment when they can lay themselves bare without feeling ashamed, without anyone pointing a finger at them. That is the moment that’s more private than divulging one’s secrets at the confessional when there are still the priest’s listening ears. But people are also in the habit of cheating, not just others but even themselves. They are good at self-rationalization. They are not unaware of the fact that what they do is objectionable but they also know how to find valid reasons to justify their actions: “Well, I do it just to save my ass… well, it’s better that he dies rather than I…well, what else can I do under such a critical situation…well, you may say that as you are not the one who suffers…well, nothing is equal in this world; I do it just to be fair to myself…etc. ,etc. Befriending our own shadow certainly lets us know our shortcomings but protecting the shadow is tantamount to giving ourselves repeated chances to spoil ourselves. Light and shadow are two twin brothers born on the same day and at the same second, living together inseparably until the end of their time. Admittedly, no one can rid oneself of one’s shadow. It dogs one’s every step. But the light of conscience, with its varying intensity, does cast a shadow with different shades --- lighter or dimmer, clearer or more blur, and the shadow disappears when light comes to its full intensity. There is famous Chinese saying: 君子不欺暗室 . That is to say, an aboveboard and honorable man never takes advantage (or lie to himself) of a dark room. Oh, we know our own shadow so well, but lamentably, we can’t hold back lying even to ourselves.
回覆刪除[版主回覆06/29/2010 19:20:00]Because the truth may hurt terribly, most people avoid anxiety provoking "awareness" by adopting the kind of excuses that you mentioned. Psychologists call this type of overt but unconscious behavior to conceal from oneself the "true" motivation for our actions, thoughts or feelings "rationalization", which along with repression, regression, projection etc constitute one of the most often used "psychogical defences". Yes, our shadow follows us wherever we go. It is the other side of the same coin, our double, our other face, the dark side of our psyche. Even if we do reflections, the moment we begin to feel a little bit uncomfotable about who we might be, the other defense mechanism will automatically, unconsciously swing into action. We project on to our enemies the very same trait we find unacceptable in ourselves; we repress the unpleasant realization that we possess evil thought; we deny that we ever had them etc. It takes courage to confront our evil side or our shadow. But unless we do so, the repressed "shadow" will continue to haunt us and from time to time may erupt with a kind a violence we never previously suspect would be possible. No one can afford to be a liar to himself forever without paying the penalty sooner or later, in one way or another.