The film Martha Marcy May Marlene (2011) winner of the best director award at the Sundance Film Festival, is the debut feature film of a talented young American director Sean Durkin, who wrote the screenplay himself. The drama is played out by 4 principal actors, Martha (Elizabeth Olsen ), her sister Lucy (Sarah Paulson), her husband Ted (Hugh Dancy) and the cult leader Patrick (John Hawkes).
As the film opens, we see a girl running away into the woods,hiding in a hollow from the pursuing inmates of a broken down farm house equipped with just the bare essentials for survival. She calls Lucy, her estranged, guilt ridden and solicitous middle class sister and her sole surviving relative, from a payphone in a road side cafe and greyhound bus station. She looks scared and confused and is in obvious distress. Her sister asks her to wait for her, picks her up in her car and takes her into her beautiful rented lakeside vacation home in Connecticut where she was spending her annual 2 weeks holiday with her husband Ted, pending the completion of their official home closer to New York City. Martha obviously does not behave in a "socially acceptable" manner. e.g. she would think nothing of swimming naked in the lake in full view of the neighbors and would sneak into her sister's bedroom to lay beside her in her bed whilst her sister is making love with her husband and after having stayed a while in her sister's house when it was suggested to her that it was about time she thought about what she would like to do with her life like finding a job, she protested that it was not necessary and that Ted's life about measuring success by money and possession was simply "not right".
Whilst still recovering from her recent trauma, she freaked out during a party thrown by her sister at the house when she met a man serving drinks who looked like Patrick, the cult leader who welcomed her into the cult, "initiated" her into it by "doing" her from behind after she is "prepared" by putting on a special ritual white dress and drinking a herbal tea, watched his group having communal sex from a step in the staircase, strummed on the guitar a song specially dedicated to Marcy May, a name he gave her to symbolize the acquisition of her new identity (Martha Marlene on the outside but Marcy May inside) said she was "special" because she was "a teacher and a leader" an ideal which her sister had pushed her to achieve in her own way but failed to, taught her how to do farm work and shoot with a pistol and who decreed that the women should eat only after the men have finished in their little "commune" and who periodically caused some of his cult members to burgle into the houses of wealthy house owners nearby and steal whatever they needed and on one occasion even killed its innocent owner for fear of his reporting them to the police. It was probably a combination of the violence that she witnessed coupled with her role in "initiating" another new teenage girl into the cult and her feeling that she had somehow been "betrayed" that finally caused her to run away.
Until the end of the film, when we see Martha being driven in Lucy's car by the latter to seek outside help after a violent episode in which she yanked Ted down a flight of steps when she was in one of her "states", she never spilled a single word about what happened to her during those half sweet and half traumatized years in that barn-like small "self-sufficient" alternative commune. What would happen to her? It's anyone's guess. Whatever the outcome may be, it's certain that Durkin seems to want us to think a little about two kinds of very contrasting social values and the respective strengths and weaknesses of each. But I don't this aspect is much developed or very much emphasized. He seems quite happy to "just present" what happened.
The film was done in a very natural, low keyed way as we see Martha gliding between the present and her recent past, between reality and her occasional flash back to her life at that Manson-like cult. I like the way in which Durkin slowly unravels piece by piece the puzzle of what happened before Martha finally decided to escape from that isolated and closed community. Olsen was excellent as an actress. She conveyed perfectly the stupor, the confusion in her disturbed mind, the conflict of emotions, the blurring of boundaries between illusion and reality and her uncertainty about what to believe any more, haunted by what she went through during those two or three years. and her resolution not to tell even her sister what she went on at the commune because she was sure that her sister and her husband would never understand her. here were some really sensuous photography and music was used sensitively to create just the right kind of atmosphere at the commune.Not a perfect film perhaps but to me, certainly one which deserves to be seen by more.
I believe Caucasians are more susceptible or tend to behave the way these people behave in this film. I think oriental people, owing to cultural and traditional differences, are very unlikely to act out these behaviors. The violence and sex involved are more of a strategy to attract audience. Without them box-office results will be poor.
回覆刪除[版主回覆03/29/2012 17:32:34]You'll be surprised. I have dealt with many cases of superstitious ladies, mind you, not uneducated, who have been swindled by a religious cult called "Ching Lung Kau" (Green Dragon Religion") of both money and sex, by so-called Taoist "priests" who promised them relief from misfortunes. There are weak-minded and/or emotionally deprived people everywhere who easily fall victim to the seduction of "easy" solutions to all their problems by unscrupulous but charismatic 'cult" leaders. .
(0^◇^0) Elzorro 近日好嗎 ? 隻熊回來啦 !
回覆刪除[版主回覆03/30/2012 07:32:03]I'm fine and very busy watching films of the HKIFF. How have you been keeping?
Interesting plot! Thanks for your sharing.
回覆刪除[超哥回覆04/03/2012 12:19:06]Your critics are always interesting to read!
[版主回覆04/03/2012 11:42:11]Not at all, going over it I found many mistakes. Somehow it doesn't look good if they remain uncorrected. Sorry to bother you to read them again.
[超哥回覆04/03/2012 11:38:50]Thanks very much!
[版主回覆04/03/2012 11:33:04]I have revised my previous reply to correct for grammatical mistakes as follows: What Martha went through follows typical "cultish" ideology and practices which those who have studied such phenomena characterized by the following features: absolute loyalty, allegiance being demanded and enforced by actual or veiled threats to one’s body or eternal spiritual condition; an altered diet (normally very little meat) to increase emotional susceptibility to acceptance of cultish beliefs, doubts being silenced by repetitious songs and chants glorifying the joys of cultish life and fostering a sense of being blessed; differences in dress, language, names, and interests are minimized to erode individual identity and independent thinking; otherwise ambiguous half truths are presented often in extremely long ( to wear down a member's intellectual resistance) persuasive sermons with a few simple easy to remember "catch phrases" by a sklilful charismatic leader, thought to be imbued with special gift, spiritual insight or moral power, usually with a special slant to discourage logical thought; the inculcation of beliefs in a self-righteous exclusivity of cult members, often fostering a strong "we/they" mentality in which the outsiders are considered as spiritually "inferior"; all or part of a person's assets are donated to the "common pool" of the cult so that member's ability to independently survive is materially compromised and he/she would be forced to have a financial stake in the continuance and economic well-being of the cult and to become increasingly dependent upon the cult, thus creating a "cognitive dissonance" situation in which one has more to lose by renouncing his own faith; the use of various hypnotic techniques of suggestion, authoritative command, repetition are used, once the trust of cult members have been won; often physically isolating cult members from "normal" contact with the conventional world so that there will be little or no chance of members getting an "alternative" viewpoints from their parents, friends, teachers etc.; complete break down of personal privacy so that members do not have time to do any "independent" thinking or critical reflections; "love bombing" by giving members physical affection, care and concern and constant contrived attention to foster a false sense of shared comraderie and companionship and disruption of former intimate relationship by fostering new emotional relationship e.g.bonding with another cult member; constant physical activities in the cult community eg. work and/or game so that members do not have time to do any independent thinking; behavior modification through the use of positive reward and negative punishment to condition member's response in Skinnerian fashion to give stock response, exploiting member's desire for social acceptance by peer pressure against doubters; surrendering of personal privacy so that the ego’s normal emotional defensive mechanisms is demolished by having new member share personal secrets giving him/her a bad name which can later be used for intimidation, fostering unquestioning submission to the leader, who is often portrayed as a seer, prophet or otherwise possessed of extraordinary spiritual insight and moral power; members are encouraged to denounce the values and beliefs of his former life. Some of all of such techniques are readily apparent in this film.
[版主回覆03/30/2012 10:39:00]Don't mention it. I enjoy doing so.
[超哥回覆03/30/2012 10:30:19]Thanks very much for the very comprehensive review!