In the Preface to the piece, Lord Byron said that the character Harold was introduced merely for the sake of giving "some connexion to the piece" and that he is "entirely a child of the imagination" .The piece belongs to the genre of "programme music". In relating his adventures, Tchaikovsky always associated the appearance of Harold with a characteristic motif which is repeated in each of the symphony's four movements. The piece has a rather checkered history. The idea was first suggested to Berlioz, a master of this form, by the Russian critic Vladimor Straso. Berlioz started on it but never finished it. So Strasov approached Mily Balakiev, who finished some skeleton but again didn't finish it. After another 15 years, Balakiev passed his ideas to Tchaikovky who quickly finished in 1855 whilst in an Alpine resort. It's a very colorful piece with a short title for each movement: the first in lento lugubre--moderanto con moto-Andante, is Harold in the Alps, the second in Vivace cons spirito, "The Fairy of the Alps appears before Manfred through the rainbow of spray from a waterfall, the third in Andante con moto "Pastorale. The simple, free and peaceful life of the Alpine hunters" and the fourth in Allegro con fuoco "The subterranean palace of Aimanes., Manfred appears in the centre of the orgy. The appearance of the spirit of Astarte who predicts the end of Manfred's earthly life. Manfred's death." It has a very important part for the piano in the piece, something very convenient because Rozhdestvensky arrives with his very accomplished pianist wife Viktoria Posnikova, who also played for us the first piece of the evening, Tchaikovky's Piano Concerto No. 2 in G, Op. 44, a piece seldom heard in Hong Kong. A usual criticism of the piece is that to please his patron, Tchakovsky included a very long section for dialogue between the violin and the cello but Tchaikovsky did make some effort to cause them to interact with the piano towards the end of the movement. There is a long version and a short version of the first movement which when it was first performed in November 1881 in New York drew the comment that its first movement was too long. It has since been revised but the one we had was Tchaikovsky's original long version.
Posnikova is an excellent pianist. A rather substantial lady with an ample figure, she appeared in a long and colorful Russia evening gown which hugs her body and gives an air of lightness. But her play was powerful, passionate and sensitive and drew long applauses.from the audience who was so stunned by her performance that they stopped for a really long while before they started to clap their hands. Rozhdestvensky was an old gentleman who walked slowly and with great dignity upon the stage with his fringe of white hair upon his bald head and his big belly, rather like the old man in Walt Disney's Pinnochio cartoon He conducted with an apparent ease which only a master can command and drew a wonderful performance from the HKPO. The only complaints my companions had for the evening came from Mr. Chu, who gave me one of his characteristic rueful smiles indicating that it meant his chance for another post-concert evening snacks had been rendered entirely illusory now! It was an excellent concert. I'm really lucky to be able to be a part of it.
It's Pletnev performing Piano concerto no.2 at video 1, it is not a popular piece at all .
回覆刪除Manfred Symphony is not popular too, but I think it is as good as symphony no.6 phathetic. There is a DG disc of it by Russian National Symphony and conducted by Pletnev, I love that very much and once listen to it repeatedly for almost a month.
[本生堂回覆03/19/2012 16:46:17]Just finished the 1977 recording, it's quite good, thanks.
It's quite different to Pletnev's, esp. the first few movements.
I shall post another version that I got at youtube.
[本生堂回覆03/19/2012 16:10:57]Manfred may be more popular in recent years, probably not so 10 or 20 years ago, and there are not many options at youtube too.
Pletnev's DG disc, is probably the best version I ever heard, you will love it if you listen to it.
[版主回覆03/19/2012 15:50:41]You're right. No.2 is not as popular as No. 1 and for a good reason too. it is much less integrated. But there are good moments too. But Manfred is much more popular. Pletnev is an excellent player as well as conductor.
hi El Zorro, i attended the saturday performance too & thoroughly enjoyed it. I luv the piano concerto no.2 very much, even more so than the popular no.1. Have u heard the Gilels rendition of no.2? It's really very beautiful.
回覆刪除[版主回覆03/22/2012 04:08:47]I haven't. Maybe I should find out.
[dupreheifetz's world回覆03/20/2012 17:39:23]Hi 本生堂, I'm looking for the Gilels' Tchai no.2 CD. & have you two heard the rendition by Stephen Hough? It's also pretty good & I kept playing it at home. But yes, likewise I do have a lot of CDs left "untouched" at home. =)
[版主回覆03/20/2012 10:38:31]You're not alone in having CDs' which hasn't been played since bought, especially some of those forming part of a 20, 30, 50, 70 CD collections!
[本生堂回覆03/20/2012 10:11:30]I had that CD too but had never finished listen to it once.
[版主回覆03/20/2012 07:51:37]Yes, indeed. Gilels' play is marvelous.
Western large scale classical music gives me an overwhelming impression. Though I don't attend such performances much, I enjoyed everyone of them. I know little about the names of the musical instruments, of famous performers and all the related terms, but I like to listen to the 波蘭壯闊、如星河無際的music!
回覆刪除[版主回覆03/22/2012 03:34:38]Then perhaps you may like to listen to some of the music of Scriabin.